12 µm | 25 µm | 60 µm | 100 µm | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRAS Name | Field | IRAS Name | Field | IRAS Name | Field | IRAS Name | Field |
00515-6308 | 25 | 00515-6308 | 25 | 00163-1039 | 162* | 00163-1039 | 162* |
01452-8026 | 3 | 01452-8026 | 3 | 02228-2500 | {1}98 | 02228-2500 | {1}98 |
02039-5722 | 26 | 02039-5722 | 26 | 04315-0840 | 169* | 04315-0840 | 169* |
02110-7143 | 11 | 02110-7143 | 11 | 04461-0624 | 169* | 04461-0624 | 169* |
02238-5947 | 26 | 02238-5947 | 26 | 05189-2524 | 135 | 05189-2524 | 135 |
03040-8013 | 3 | 03040-8013 | 3 | 08354+2555 | 316* | 09320+6134 | 397 |
03336-7636 | 3 | 03336-7636 | 3 | 09320+6134 | 397 | 09437+0317 | 213* |
05150-4056 | 73 | 04330-6307 | 28 | 10565+2448 | 319* | 10565+2448 | 319* |
05174-3345 | 102 | 05150-4056 | 73 | 12540+5708 | 399 | 12540+5708 | 399 |
05217-3943 | 73 | 05174-3345 | 102 | 12590+2934 | 322* | 12590+2934 | 322* |
05345-4406 | 73 | 05217-3943 | 73 | 13136+6223 | 399 | 13136+6223 | 399 |
10416+6740 | 414 | 05345-4406 | 73 | 13136+6223 | 400 | 13136+6223 | 400 |
10521+7208 | 414 | 10416+6740 | 414 | 13183+3423 | 322* | 13183+3423 | 322* |
11284+6936 | 415 | 10521+7208 | 414 | 23488+2018 | 270* | 23488+2018 | 270* |
15448+3828 | 355 | 11284+6936 | 415 | 23591+2312 | 270* | 23591+2312 | 270* |
15566+3609 | 355 | 15448+3828 | 355 | ||||
16164+5952 | 402 | 15566+3609 | 355 | ||||
16342+6034 | 402 | 16164+5952 | 402 | ||||
17126+3625 | 357 | 16342+6034 | 402 | ||||
17133+3651 | 357 | 17126+3625 | 357 | ||||
17329+5359 | 383 | 17133+3651 | 357 | ||||
17403+6234 | 403 | 17329+5359 | 383 | ||||
17403+6234 | 403 | ||||||
20427-8243 | 9 |
|
Figure IV.B.1(a) Histograms of Position Differences in
RA Between PSC and ISSA larger largest |
The position accuracy analysis consisted of comparing the
apparent position of the selected sources in the ISSA maps with
the published source locations in the IRAS Point Source Catalog.
The ISSA position was taken
to be the photocenter of the source in the ISSA map.
Photocenters were obtained by producing a flux-weighted average of
the pixel positions over a circular region surrounding a source
after subtraction of a local background.
Figures IV.B.1(a) and
IV.B.1(b) display
histograms of difference between the PSC position and the ISSA
position for the selected point sources. Table IV.B.2
summarizes the
statistics obtained from the histograms. The mean position
differences between the PSC and ISSA are less than 0.1 pixel
(9") and the expected position uncertainty of a
single source is less than 0.2 pixel (18").
|
Figure IV.B.1(b) Histograms of Position
Differences in DEC Between PSC and ISSA larger largest |
12 µm | 25 µm | 60 µm | 100 µm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
# of Sources | 23 | 24 | 14 | 15 |
Mean Delta R.A. (') | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.040 | 0.031 |
sigma(Delta R.A.) (') | 0.156 | 0.267 | 0.179 | 0.224 |
Mean Delta Dec. (') | 0.070 | 0.034 | -0.078 | -0.131 |
sigma(Delta Dec.) (') | 0.126 | 0.225 | 0.156 | 0.236 |