Proceedings of the Particle Physics and Early Universe Conference (PPEUC).
For this paper: postscript previous 1 Introduction... up Abstract... next 3 The Sunyaev--Zel'dovich Effect...

2 The Mass Function and  

The easiest way to understand this dependence is by considering the mass function, the number density of collapsed objects as a function of mass and redshift (e.g. Bartlett (1997)). In `standard' models, based on the growth of initially small density perturbations with Gaussian statistics, this takes the general form of a power law times a Gaussian (Press & Schechter (1974)):

 

In this equation, is the mean, comoving density of the Universe and is the power spectrum as a function of the mass scale, . The quantity

is a function of the linear growth factor, , which depends on and , of the critical density needed for collapse, , which has only a weak dependence on and , and of , the present-day power spectrum, a function of mass only. The appearance of in the exponential of the mass function indicates that the dependence can be quite strong; hence, the comment that even a small number of clusters at large can severely constrain the density parameter. The key point is that the shape of the redshift distribution of clusters of a given mass is only determined by the cosmological parameters (the power spectrum cannot be changed to alter this fact) (Oukbir & Blanchard (1997)).

The problem is that we do not measure mass directly; we need some other, more readily observable quantity which correlates well with cluster mass. Because we believe that the hot cluster gas is heated by infall during cluster formation, we expect that the X-ray temperature should represent the depth of the cluster potential well and, therefore, its mass. This has in fact been well established by various hydrodynamical simulations (in `standard' scenarios) (Evrard et al. (1996)), which also provide the exact form of the temperature-mass relation. The X-ray luminosity, on the other hand, is a more complicated animal, depending not only on the temperature of the gas, but also on its abundance and spatial distribution. As we discuss below, observing clusters via the Sunyaev--Zel'dovich effect avoids these problems associated with the X-ray flux, while preserving the simplicity of a straightforward flux measurement (plus other advantages). This is important because X-ray spectra demand time-consuming, space-based observations.

 
Table 1:  Model Parameters normalised to the local X-ray temperature function (Henry & Arnaud (1991))

For our discussion here, we take a phenomenological point of view and adopt a power-law approximation to the power spectrum: , where is the bias parameter and is the mass contained in a sphere of . We will focus on the comparison of two extreme models, a critical model and an open model with ( in both cases). The parameters and for each model are constrained by fitting to the local X-ray temperature function of galaxy clusters (Henry & Arnaud (1991)), the results of which are given in Table 1 (Oukbir et al. (1997), Oukbir & Blanchard (1997)).


PPEUC Proceedings
Fri Jul 25 11:32:28 BST 1997